🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on protagonists pursuing fresh starts, struggling to escape substance abuse or harmful partnerships, only to witness hope devolve into aggression. Chris Kraus frequently uses the phrase "fresh start", transforming it into deliberately jaded through recurring use. Phrases such as "He aimed to start over" and "They decided to make a fresh start" recur in the story. At the same time, the author herself seems to be making her personal new beginning, as this presents as a different type of work – documentarian, genuinely novelistic. But then it reveals itself to be laden with the recurring issues and approaches as earlier books.

From Chance Novelist to Renowned Book

The writer was originally an artist who became a writer almost accidentally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, made up of missives to a distant beloved, elevating intimate women's literature from humiliation into assassination. She persisted as a writer, but the three subsequent engaging and challenging novels missed the power and directness that the correspondence format imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her position as a nonconformist creator who had become a extensive real estate holder, so there was significant attention on housing investments. It makes sense that she now wants to experiment with fresh narrative sources, turning outward to external narratives, at a moment when she claims that current political era turns intimate literature obsolete.

Multiple Generations, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing multiple eras – each trapped by their pasts. The book includes the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, based on the author's parents, moving from the Bronx to rural Connecticut. There is the narrative of the author, in the guise of protagonist Catt Greene, reckoning with the belated success of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her addict husband a man named Paul. And there is the narrative of a homicide of one directionless individual by another in a locality mostly forsaken by forward-thinking policies only a brief drive from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.

From my perspective as a reader drawn to honed writing of the kind Kraus herself typically rejects, I was enchanted by the literary tone of the opening part.

Being a reader drawn to crafted language of the kind that Kraus herself usually avoids, I was won over by the novelistic voice of the opening segment. It exhibits a new quality of attentiveness that allows space for small details, like the bucket that the youthful Catt frees from the ice at the beginning of the narrative, helped by her beloved father. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she exclaims; "a nice toy", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like sweet treats". Kraus writes Emma's narrative with inquiry and familiarity. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not hers, exactly."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was destined to be disappointed when I hoped this different style could continue through the novel. The author states here that she dislikes the pleasure those who appreciate polished prose have taken from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to disjunction, to the unpolished style she shares with her inspiration Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels returns in the central part. Catt Greene is working on refurbishing three dozen dilapidated units in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while traveling between two different states, unable to aid Paul curb his addiction. She feels helpless as Paul cycles through poorly supported positions as an recovery specialist in a environment driven by the rage and anxiety that underpins Trump's victory. There are several pages about Catt being cancelled on Twitter, her professional designation altered from "writer" to "landlord" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to invest excessive emotion about this. At one point she says that she's researching the homicide so that before exiting the region, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her Twitter detractors would not understand, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the eponymous day passed by the deceased with the killer and his companions. The author possesses great source material, and reconstructs step by step what occurred as a man named Brandon came to visit Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but seems amiably to have occupied the day in the company of her associates, wandering about getting his car mended and funding treats and narcotics, before being murdered by Brittney's partner Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has frequently been hospitalised for violent rage.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

The protagonist becomes fixated by the story, and I was fascinated by the way that her twin drives towards ethical reporting and reckless transgression tussle in this section. But I'd have liked her to go further into her own obsessions here. The compelling persona is Brittney, who gains dimension in part due to Catt's identification with her – another bright, bullied girl going off the rails in a troubled, forgotten town. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The complete segment feels strangely incomplete, to the point that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par